compare · cited vs profound

Cited vs Profound.

Profound is the $1B-valuation AI visibility monitor. Cited is the autonomous execution layer that runs on top of monitoring like it. The honest comparison — who wins for which buyer, across features, price, and what each tool actually ships.

The one-sentence difference.

Profound shows you where you’re invisible. Cited makes you visible.

Profound is the highest-funded platform in the category — $155M total, $1B valuation at its Feb 2026 Series C. It is a serious, enterprise-grade monitoring tool. Its differentiator is scale: it claims tracking against 400M+ real prompts across 10+ engines, with SOC 2 and HIPAA on its enterprise plans. If the buying criterion is “most comprehensive dashboard,” Profound wins.

Cited is a different shape. It probes the five engines that matter commercially (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude), runs the gap analysisthe same way Profound does, and then continues: drafts the off-site content, distributes it through vetted channels, and reports on citation lift. Seven Claude-based agents run the pipeline; a human approves every asset before it ships. If the buying criterion is “new citations landed this month,” Cited wins.

Feature-by-feature comparison.

CapabilityCitedProfound
AI engines probed5 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AIO, Gemini, Claude)10+ (incl. Copilot, You.com, Meta AI)
Citation share + SoVYes — per engine, per queryYes — per engine, per prompt
Competitor trackingUp to 5+ competitorsUnlimited on higher tiers
Revenue attributionGA4 filter templates + cross-session stitchingYes — proprietary attribution
Volatility trackingRolling 4-week, per queryYes
Content draftingYes — 6–20 assets / monthNo
Off-site distributionYes — directory, Reddit, LinkedIn, PR, WikipediaNo
Human review + approval UIYes — Kanban approve / revise / rejectN/A (no content produced)
Monthly report PDFYes — auto-generated, deliveredExportable from dashboard
Enterprise complianceSOC 2 on Dominate tierSOC 2 + HIPAA available
Self-serve entry price$1,500/mo (Monitor)~$99/mo self-serve (verify before publish)
Done-for-you executionYes — the default postureNo — DIY or bring-your-own agency
The one thing Cited does that Profound does not.Cited ships the content. Monitoring without execution leaves the customer with a dashboard full of red and the same inbound problem they started with — now quantified. Cited’s seven-agent pipeline (gap-analysis, content-strategist, content-writer, content-qa, distribution-planner, report, citation-probe) closes the loop between “we see the gap” and “the gap is filled.”

Pricing — the honest math.

Profound’s self-serve tiers start near $99/month, with mid-market tiers in the $199–$399 range, and enterprise pricing on request. Verify current numbers on tryprofound.com before quoting in outbound.Cited’s published tiers are flat: $1,500 Monitor, $3,500 Growth, $7,500 Dominate.

The raw per-month numbers look like Cited is more expensive. The delivered scope is different. Profound is a software license — you pay for access to the dashboard; the team using it is yours. Cited is a service — the retainer includes 6–20 pieces of off-site content produced and distributed every month, plus the monitoring layer. On a per-deliverable basis, Cited’s Growth tier runs roughly $175–$580 per shipped, cited-optimized asset. A traditional content agency producing the same output starts at $8,000/month and requires CMS access. See Cited pricing for the full breakdown.

When to pick Profound.

  • You have an in-house content team and an existing agency relationship. You need a best-in-class dashboard to coordinate them.
  • You need coverage across fringe engines (Copilot, You.com, Meta AI) that Cited does not probe today.
  • You need HIPAA compliance at the monitoring layer and plan to handle PHI-adjacent queries.
  • Your monthly citation-velocity target is <3 new assets and you have the in-house talent to produce them.

When to pick Cited.

  • You want new citations landed every week — not a report telling you why they haven’t.
  • Your team is small, or you’re not willing to stand up a content team for a channel that didn’t exist 18 months ago.
  • You don’t want to coordinate an agency + a monitoring tool + a distribution ops person. One retainer replaces the stack.
  • You value off-site focus — 56% of AI citations come from off-site sources, and Cited’s default motion is designed around that fact (AirOps, 2026).

Can you use both?

Yes, and several customers do. Use Profound as the source-of-truth dashboard for a broader engine set and a separate team. Use Cited’s Growth or Dominate tier for the content engine. The economics work above roughly $8,000/month total program spend.

The fastest way to compare is the free 48-hour auditagainst your own domain — Cited runs the same gap analysis Profound does on your top 50 queries and delivers the gap list as a PDF. If the list surprises you, start with Monitor. If it doesn’t, Growth or Dominate is the right tier.

◉ faq

What most people ask first.

Is Cited a Profound alternative?+
Not exactly — Cited is adjacent. Profound is an enterprise-grade monitoring platform. Cited is a done-for-you service that monitors and executes. Buyers who just want dashboards pick Profound. Buyers who want the content pipeline that closes the citation gaps buy Cited. Several customers run both.
How does Profound pricing compare to Cited?+
Profound publicly lists tiers in roughly the $99–$399/month range for self-serve with custom enterprise pricing above that (verify current numbers on tryprofound.com before citing in outbound). Cited: $1,500 Monitor, $3,500 Growth, $7,500 Dominate. Profound is a SaaS license; Cited includes the content production and distribution work, so the delivered-per-dollar comparison isn't apples to apples.
Does Profound produce or distribute content?+
No. Profound is explicitly a monitoring and analytics platform. It surfaces citation gaps, competitor coverage, and share-of-voice metrics, but the execution — writing, distributing, landing the off-site assets — is on the customer or their agency.
Which engines does each platform cover?+
Profound covers 10+ engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, AI Overviews, plus Bing Copilot, You.com, and Meta AI. Cited probes the five that drive 98% of commercial AI traffic in 2026: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Claude. Breadth vs focus — the right answer depends on how many engines your buyer actually uses.
Should enterprise teams use Profound or Cited?+
Enterprises with in-house content teams + an established agency usually pair a monitoring platform (Profound or equivalent) with Cited's Dominate tier for execution. Enterprises without that content infrastructure pick Cited alone, because one retainer replaces monitoring + agency + distribution.
◉ keep reading

Want Cited to run the audit for you?

50 target queries, 5 AI engines, competitor gap analysis. 48-hour turnaround. Free.

Get your free audit →